FDA’s Proposed Change to the Regulation of Laser Pointers

By Patrick Murphy

In October 2016, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) put forth a preliminary proposal to declare green, blue, yellow and violet laser pointers as “defective.” Only orange-red and red laser pointers would be allowed to be manufactured, imported or sold in the U.S.

This proposal was in response to the thousands of illegal and unsafe laser pointers aimed at aircraft in the U.S. According to the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), pilots reported 7,442 laser incidents in 2016 — more than 20 every night. 91% of the incidents involved green laser light.

Laser Illuminations reported to U.S. FAA, annual total

Safety experts are most concerned about the bright light from laser pointers causing distraction, glare and temporary flash blindness. When visual interference occurs during critical phases of flight such as takeoffs, landings, low altitude maneuvers and emergencies, there is potential for an aircraft accident. Visual interference also has disrupted police and rescue missions.

Pilot groups and lawmakers have called for restrictions on pointers, especially green ones. For example, in February 2016 Sen. Chuck Schumer (D-N.Y.) met with the incoming FDA commissioner, who agreed to consider having FDA ban the sale of green pointers.

To understand FDA’s proposal, it is helpful to describe how FDA can change its regulations, and what a finding of “defective” means.

Under 21 CFR 1040.10 and 1040.11, FDA has limited regulatory authority over laser devices, and over three laser uses. These regulations were written well before laser pointers and thus do not specifically address pointer usage or misuse. (A separate law passed by Congress in 2012 as part of FAA legislation does make it illegal to aim the beam of a laser pointer at an aircraft, or the flight path of an aircraft. The penalty is up to 5 years in prison and/or up to a $250,000 fine.)

To update its regulations, FDA is required to present them first to a permanent statutory committee, the 15-member Technical Electronic Product Radiation Safety Standards Committee. In October 2016 FDA presented TEPRSSC with a wide range of electronic product radiation safety proposals. Two of these dealt with laser pointers.

The first proposal was to define “laser pointer.” The agency suggested the following wording:

Handheld laser products designed for battery-powered operation that are manufactured, designed, intended or promoted to provide illumination, designation of a target or point of origin, or sighting, with no associated technological or scientific purpose for the laser’s emission. Laser products are not excluded as laser pointers when used for visual entertainment, vision disruption, to startle, or novelty purposes.

The second proposal was to restrict laser pointers based on the beam color.

The FDA showed TEPRSSC members the following chart showing the eye’s sensitivity to colors under light-adapted and dark-adapted vision:

Human photopic and scotopic response

The three circled areas show how the dark-adapted human eye (dashed curve) perceives red light as much dimmer than equivalent amounts of blue and green light.

FDA told TEPRSSC that “[t]he hazard from laser aircraft illuminations would be effectively eliminated if green and blue laser pointers were not available. Colors at 615 nm and longer, viewed with night-adapted vision, appear only 1.4% as bright as green at the commonly manufactured 532 [nm].”

FDA then invoked 21 CFR 1003.2. This regulation states that a product is defective if it “… emits electronic product radiation [in this case, visible light] unnecessary to the accomplishment of its primary purpose which creates a risk of injury …”

FDA said there is a risk of injury from visual impairment from laser pointers aimed towards operators of aircraft, vehicles and watercraft, and noted that “pilots are particularly vulnerable to disruptive visual impairment at night.” Based on this risk, FDA would prohibit the manufacture or importation of laser pointers from 400 nm (deep violet) to 609 nm (red-orange). Pointers from 610 nm to 710 nm (deep red) would be permitted.

As with current laser pointers, the power output would be limited to less than 5 milliwatts.

If implemented, FDA’s proposal would not affect individual possession of laser pointers in the 400-609 nm range. It would only restrict manufacture and importation of such pointers.

A key benefit of FDA’s proposal is to make it easier to control the vast majority of pointers — green — that are involved in pilot reports of laser interference. If a pointer’s beam is any color other than red or red-orange, it would not be permitted for sale in the U.S. No additional testing, using expensive power meters, would be necessary.

In addition, state and local authorities could enact color-based restrictions based on FDA’s “defective” determination. This would, for example, allow a police officer to take action such as confiscation based solely on the color of the laser beam. FDA told TERPSSC ” we envision that just like any other hazardous product that has been determined to be defective, that state and local … ordinances and laws would be put in place that would likely deal with the use of green and blue laser pointers.”

Members of the TEPRSSC committee generally agreed with FDA’s laser pointer proposals, while also raising some concerns for further consideration.

The next step is for FDA to review its TEPRSSC proposals in light of the members’ comments, and make any changes FDA feels are appropriate. After this, FDA would publish the official proposed regulations in the Federal Register. The public would have from 30 to 180 days to comment. Based on those comments FDA could drop a proposed rule, change it and resubmit for new comments, or proceed with a final rule if comments were favorable or only required minor changes.

In summary, the FDA has made a first-in-the-world proposal to allow manufacture only of red pointers (610-710 nm). By designating all others (400-609 nm) as “defective”, this would give the agency additional regulatory authority which makes it much easier for authorities to determine which laser pointers may be imported, manufactured or (depending on state and local laws) sold, owned or used.

Additional details about the proposal are in an 11-page paper presented March 21 at the International Laser Safety Conference, available online at http://bit.ly/2pvfwpw.

 

 

Laser Safety Community Focused on Safeguarding Consumers Who Are Attending Light Shows and Acquiring Pointers

A December 2013 laser light show in France. Source: Wikipedia Commons/Kergourlay

By Geoff Giordano

With plenty of summer left to enjoy, it is appropriate to remind revelers to be aware when attending outdoor laser demonstrations or using handheld laser pointers. More and more handheld laser pointers are being sold to consumers and tourists — especially online — and they often exceed the output power listed on the label.

As lasers continue to break new ground as tools of healing, communication and entertainment, knowing how to avoid beam-related eye and skin injuries is paramount. New research illustrates the need for consumers to use caution and be aware of potential dangers.

A study presented at LIA’s International Laser Safety Conference in March warned of the dangers laser pointers present to youths. The study, led by U.K. ophthalmologist Fahd Quhill and related by ILSC General Chair John O’Hagan of Public Health England, presented cases of permanent eye damage suffered by five children in Sheffield, England. Consumer lasers given as gifts or acquired from websites, tourist destinations or modified commercial products cost some of those children more than 50 percent of their vision.

“What do you do” when a laser-related eye injury suffered by a youngster “wipes out the possibility of a whole range of career opportunities (for them)?” O’Hagan asked.

One move toward a solution came in February 2014 with a decision by the European Commission to put controls on laser products intended for consumers. According to O’Hagan, the decision indicates that “child-appealing products shall not cause damage to the eyes or skin in case of any exposure that could occur under any conditions of use, including deliberate, long-term exposure with optical viewing instruments.” The broadly applicable statement also helps regulate products intended for home hair removal. The decision allows the manufacture of products “that can do something to the skin providing (they) can’t harm the eye,” O’Hagan explained.

Meanwhile, increasingly popular laser light displays at concerts and festivals can pose a danger to spectators from unintended exposures to the laser source. Peter Blattner of the Swiss Federal Institute of Metrology (METAS) discussed the agency’s real-time assessment of laser shows and potential irradiation of spectators. The system was tested successfully in the field at about 20 laser shows in Switzerland, those tests often mandated by regulators or show operators. The tests found that all the shows exceeded maximum permissible exposure limits, Blattner said — some by up to 120 times those limits. The shows were adjusted to acceptable levels.

The challenge with laser light shows, said James Stewart of LVR Optical, is that “one minute they are quite smooth and fluid beams, the next minute they can (become) very stationary for a few milliseconds — enough time to create these accentuated, tight finger beams of light.”

Stewart and Blattner noted the prevalence of lower-cost laser projectors available to show organizers.

“As far as nightclubs go,” Stewart explained, “the entry-level (power) is three watts.” He notes that many people who attend his training sessions after recently purchasing a three-watt or five-watt laser for light shows “become a bit disillusioned” when they learn they can’t use the system to scan the crowd in their small venue.

In larger-scale uses, laser systems are typically eight to 30 watts, Stewart said, but typically only one to three watts would be used to scan an audience. He has been involved in assessing audience-scanning laser light shows presented by major global recording artists when they performed in the U.K. Even a one-watt laser will be hazardous at around 200 meters, he noted.

While show presenters can alter the laser beam to be less harmful to audiences, to avoid injury at shows, it is generally advisable not to intentionally stare or look at where the laser beam is coming from.

As O’Hagan pointed out, in some cases people struck in the eye by a beam from a handheld laser pointer were not injured by the beam but from rubbing their eyes after the fact.

To help inform the public, LIA created a primer on laser pointers and tips for using them safely. The guidelines are intended to be shared freely in the hopes of helping avoid accidents.

LIA advises the following in regard to laser pointers:

  • Never shine a laser pointer at anyone. Laser pointers are designed to illustrate inanimate objects.
  • Do not allow minors to use a pointer unsupervised. Laser pointers are not toys.
  • Do not point a laser pointer at mirror-like surfaces. A reflected beam can act like a direct beam on the eye.
  • Do not purchase a laser pointer if it does not have a caution or danger sticker on it identifying its class. Report suspicious devices to the FDA.

Geoff is LIA’s communications director. Contact him at ggiordano@lia.org to share your experiences with lasers, sound off on issues regarding any facet of laser technology, suggest stories or offer your commentary with a guest article or blog post.

LIA Showcases Potential Solutions to Laser Strikes on Aircraft

By Geoff Giordano

Despite significant criminal penalties, laser pointer strikes on aircraft continue to endanger flight crews, passengers and other citizens. Experts spotlighted the persistent problem by sharing potential solutions at the Laser Institute of America’s International Laser Safety Conference.

With nearly 4,000 laser strikes of aircraft reported annually in the U.S. since 2011, according to the FAA the need for educating the public is clear, according to LIA Executive Director Peter Baker and Education Director Gus Anibarro. When laser beams illuminate the cockpit of an aircraft, they can distract or temporarily blind pilots.

Several experts shared growing concerns about handheld laser devices during ILSC 2015 from March 23-26 in Albuquerque, N.M. Such devices, readily available from online sellers or at tourist destinations, are often mislabeled and more powerful than indicated.

Joshua Hadler, chief laser safety officer of the National Institute of Standards and Technology, detailed NIST’s method for determining laser pointer output. Many of the handheld devices he has tested exceeded the output listed on those devices. Continue reading